Saturday, January 10, 2015

Mysticism - A Truth , A Reality

Mysticism - A Truth- A Reality
Answered By: Prof. Ahmed Rafique Akhtar
(An Interview to a French Journalist)

Q# 1: Who is Sufi /mystic?
Answer: To my mind Sufi is the one who opts for the God as top priority of intellectual curiosity. He maintains that priority by remembering him continuously as ordered and suggested by God. And also fights within and without and tries to acquire a balance within him and without.
Q# 2: Who is not a Sufi/mystic?
Answer: Well! For these years you will hardly see a Sufi because Sufi is not understood by percentages. It is not that you see one in hundred or one in thousand; it could be one in millions, one in billions. Because the basic sincerity is to search for God and then to pursue it all their life. It is basically a main obsession with the person who is intelligent, whose inquiry insist on finding truth. And may be in the beginning, you search it for knowledge and you search for knowledge within yourself. But to my mind the natural end of all curiosity and knowledgibilty and search and hunt for truth ends up with God. And we have seen many other who falls short of this expectation and their high end of moral exhibition and they falls short. They look for possessions, powers. They look for strengthen their own self, rather than to get rid of their self. For us the law of God is very clear that anybody who wants to find me should find opposition in his own self. So anybody who looks like promoting a sense of power in him, possession in him does not qualify for his role. Over the years ( )when every thing is corrupted the Sufi is corrupted the most, e.g. we have to find out whether there can be Sufi in other religion or not? We say, no, because all other religions are a regular, procedural progression on knowledge of God. And starting from Adam to Muhammad (SAW) we have proceeding to getting more and more knowledge about God. So if you say, that I have found God, we will not believe, because it is just a nursery of believers. And then we come to Christ and we know for sure they were more progressive than Jews but then they also fall short. The man has always been maturing in his knowledge and so the message has also been maturing with the same speed. And with the ages with prophets, they have been progressing. Finally it ended up; the revolution ended up with the Quran. And if anybody who does not believe in the Quran and prophet of God and the prophet who brought Quran, would not be qualifying for the fuller knowledge of high idealism or metaphysical entities or God Himself. So we said it is very difficult to find God without Islam. It is not possible.
Q # 3: Is Sufism finished in Pakistan?
Answer: Sufi don’t claim things. They don’t bother. The worst thing in their social life is; they don’t look for projection. And Sufi is anti-projection. All the qualities known for a successful man are reverse for a Sufi. So you will not find him in public. He is not an exhibitionist, not a narcissist. He does not have that sort of things which qualify him as a successful worldly man. So it is obvious you will not find Sufi running on the roads, or claiming things for himself or exhibiting his exercise or modeling himself in yoga’s or lama. This is not Sufism. These are only concentration Arts.
Q # 4: What kind of peculiar relations are of a Sufi with God?
Answer: That is all greatness of Allah that you are honored with one thing that you can reach him. The thing is God has created this world for himself. It is not that we created this earth. Its not that we created all this jam-packed of earth. So naturally he means some business with us. And he had explained this in so many verses.
Lo! We have shown him the way, whether he be grateful or disbelieving. (Dahar: 3)
I give you a talent, I give you thinking, and I give you apparatus of mind to think. And all I wanted you on earth, go on earth, think about surrounding, think about universe, think about life patterns and try to find out who is the creator? And you should develop greater love for him rather than any thing. It will be absurd to look for things below God’s status as God’s. So we are bound to consider God is the top truth reality. And not only that one who interfere in every bit of our life, in our first breath, in our last breath. He gives us honor, he gives us dishonor. He gives us children. He gives us parents, and when every thing is given by God then who is such a wise man, who will say God is a lesser importance. And you see our fault is very simple. This fault lies with every human being. We give lesser importance to top priority and more importance to lesser priorities.
Q # 5: Is this called the fair attitude, love attitude or respect attitude with God?
Answer: It is basically ‘love’, because their attitudes are made very clear in the Quran. Do remember me like your parents, your father, and your kith and kin. Your sweet hearts or whatever it is. But do it a little more (remembrance of Allah). And he need preference for all he created things, but the first principal lies in mind, not in heart. You have to analyze things. You have to see what is more important for you in the entire life. For a short period you have your priorities different. For a student who goes in college or universities, you can say education is his top priority then you say marriage is his top priority, and then you say job is his top priority. Then after retirement you say pension and rest is his top priority. But the fact is very different; there is a priority of whole life. It is not partial priority. It is total priority. When we consider the whole life of human being and we say, he came here for God and he should know God and leave this earth with knowledge of God and with afraiding God. This is what the Sufi does. Right from the very beginning he sorts out the priorities of life. He arranges, he knows what is more important and what is less important. And he passes through this earth like a traveler. May be the things are refutable in the way. We are not supposed to reject things; we are not supposed to refuse. We are supposed to create a balance in our desires, where the strongest desire is for the truth, for God and for reality. When we come back after finding out the truth in our mind, then we go to the lesser. God does not refuse us any love for woman or love for children, family or country. He does not refuse us any facility, He gave all these facilities. Life is a protocol made for human beings to arrange all those facilities. He made it possible for man to be comfortable on earth and to look for Him and to search for Him, to refuse Him, to deny Him and to accept Him, is the main project of the human life on earth.
Q # 6: Explain the Sufi’s path and its achievements.
Answer: let me say, how can you limit the search and how can you place a destiny when finite being is moving into infinite side, so there is no destiny. It is a continuous movement of mind and heart in to the infinite, so I don’t think; any body can say that there is any destiny or an end of going towards God. All I know is; you keep on living. A man, who stops thinking, creates a kind of a citadel for him, a kind of barrier for him. But a man who thinks about God, who constantly thinks about God, keeps on moving till his life, till his last breath and he is in a progress and that’s what we feel like. Everyone stops somewhere, the people who don’t have the God as an end in their mind or don’t think about the ultimate reality, they stops somewhere in their way. May be some body dies with the woman he likes. Somebody dies with the office he has created. Somebody dies with the lot of money, he has created, and he does not have time to use it and dies of a heart attack. But a man who lives with God, lives till his last breath of life. So there is no end, no particular end, when you are moving with God. You keep on thinking, progressing and keep achieving some new phase of thought. Everyday you are in a new thought, in a new mood and new creativity. So God is creating everything in all moments, so you keep on also creating within your own self and all mysticism is outgrowth, remember this thing. We keep moving from one state of mind to other state of mind, because, this is the progress, in fact it is intellectual progress, it is thinking progress. May be we are only intelligent like animals and then we move on and we see we are intellectuals and then we move on and re-concentrate that we have intuitions but a last degree of the most refined intellect is ILHAAM, which is in mystics and men of God. And ILHAAM has no bound. It is unlimited, till you live, till your last breath. Fragrance of their knowledge of God and also your own study of yourself, its keeps on increasing. There is no end to the intellectual capacity of a mystic. So I always thought wherever is a mystic, he is the top intellectual of his time. Mystic always remains in a good humor. There are two kinds of honesty. If an honest man is a pungent and bickering man, he does not belong to God. But any body, who is honest, is honest to good temper.
Q # 7: How would you define the state of ‘Fanaa’ and ‘Baqaa’?
Answer: These terms have been very much misused by the lesser mystics. Perhaps they are not mystics at all. They talked like mystics, but they didn’t have any sense. Fanaa does not mean, the way, that we get lost in God. No, there is nobody who gets lost in God. Fanna means to do away with our over physical instinctive qualities. And to fill in the better ones that are given by God. Suppose I am a mean man, so I was a mean man. Suppose I am a grabber, so I have been a grabber. Suppose I am a liar so I have been a liar. I know I have these bad qualities so I have to finish them. I have to march on to learn truth, instead of mean. I have to de-possess myself of those qualities. And when I do change over from those set of qualities to the other set of qualities, it means Fanaa and Baqaa means to be stable with those qualities which are gained. It does not mean that you fall into the lap of God and he covers you up. It does not mean that. These are terms which have been always misused. They create a lot of confusion in the minds of people perhaps. But over the end when you loose all your qualities then God takes you over. I empty myself with anger, with grief, with desire and I saw God take me over with his own qualities. And what are those qualities? He is Rehman, He is Raheem, He is Kareem, He is Salaam, and He is Mommin. So a person looks like God, (he is not a God) but he feels like God. People feels like that he is as kind as God could be, he is as nice as God could be, and he is as truthful as God could be. So that is Fanaa. It is almost an achievement, an achievement of qualities. First we try to follow our Prophets, because the best of the qualities a human being could have from God has are ‘our Prophet’, then we try to follow over. This is called Fana-fil-Rasool. Even below that, we call Fana-Fil- Sheikh. Suppose my students say, ‘we would like to end like our teacher’, but the teacher is not the end. So they will say, we will end like the teacher of our teacher. That is Fana-Fil Sheikh. And then we know that our Prophet leads us to God and all those qualities are found in the Prophet. They have been on unhuman level, unearthly level. They have been transferred from God.
Q # 8: Sufi can know God or not?
Answer:He certainly knows God. Nobody else can know God better than him. Because if he is not sure, (there are three steps; first you have mental argument with God, every literate, every Sufi passes through this torture. He goes to skeptics; he goes to all what Marxism tells you. He goes to logical positivist. He goes to skeptics of east and west (agnostics). He goes to all forms of denials.) That is what Kalma is also La IllHa Illal-allah (try to establish what is not God, before you say, there is God.). When we finish our arguments, when we complete and there is no doubt left in our mind and this search should be at the top most level, whether you are challenging or you are being challenged by the new Darwinism or old Darwinism, whether you are crossed by a logical positivist or an anthropologist. We see all these skeptics’ points about God. We say they are not wronged people. They have raised right kind of questions. And we tried to know validity and truths of those questions. And we answer them back and have more powerful arguments. And when we get out of this ordeal of curiosity, we say, we have no doubt in our mind, there is God, and then we tried to get closer to him i.e. mysticism. Once when we have found God and once we are sure about God, when there is no doubt in my mind about the existence of God, then I analyze every criticism against God. And I have got over it. And I have sort this oldest flings then I go ahead and say now I found you, now I like to be with you. This is mysticism and another starts!
Q # 9: What is the relationship between God and man?
Answer:I have told you before that we did not create this world and we have not come out of an accidental combination of amino acids. It was meant to be so. You see the sun would not have been in such a place if it had not been set by God. You see, about 10 millions around us, it would have burnt us and 10 millions beyond, it would have frozen us. So the man and all these constellations are placing. They are not accidental. They have been set to create a life belt. A life belt in this universe in which special experiments were done by Almighty Allah to create human beings. And then not only to create; he gave us some thing very extraordinary. I believe we are all like robots. And he created so many numerous kinds of unlimited robots. We have 13 millions sorts of creation on earth. There could be 13 millions in the skies also. Different sorts of creativity, he has been doing. And He thought; I need somebody special, I should given my choice. Because he gave choice to nobody, not to people, not to Jinn and not to angels. He thought this is what I forced in them. Things believe in me as God; as there is no other option. So he made a decision to give somebody an option. Whether believe me or not. And so for that he created a special instrument that we called our mind, our thinking process. He gave us thinking. He gave us mind an apparatus. And then he gave us the choice ‘Do you believe in me or do you not believe in me’? That is a classic maneuver God made with human being. And in lieu of that choice he made us more superior than anybody else. He gave us superiority over the rest of the things. And then he gave us the credit that even if you made the little effort and you reach the recognition, you will be awarded . Somewhere in the skies, somewhere in the universe you will be awarded a reign over, my very special utopia that is called Heaven. There are other containers also; angels thought they deserve that utopia, jinn’s thought they deserve that utopia which is called Janaat (heaven). And Janaat is not imaginary as we know the immensity of universe around us,billions and trillions of stars. It’s not a simple idea. If you look at the mountains, when the green streak comes and we know it is emerald in this mountain. You can always suppose after 50 more billion years, perhaps that all mountains turned into emerald, similarly there could be stages and places in the universe in which the whole mountains turned into emerald. The ground could be very different of combination. If He has given this (earth) he could create much finer places up there. So nothing is imaginary and people thought, it must be an idea, Dozakh (hell) will be an idea. Heaven or hell is not an idea. They are not imaginary creations. God does not tell a lie. When he tells; you have to go there, you have to go there. These are the chosen paths and when you end up show life, you go those paths. If you have discovered the truth and reality, you have another way. It is just like when the pup and people come from outside, they put them in containers. Because they are afraid, may be they have brought big diseases in this earth. They are poured, they are examined and then they are brought out, similarly we have put in graves. It’s a kind of a container; it’s a gateway to higher galaxies beyond us. They squeezed time of 70 years and ultimately go to millions and trillions. So the way is very clear. It is well understood means and matters. But the job is also very clear. Over here all these things you do or you enjoy, you don’t say we live once. We only die once over here. If we are dead we are dead. If we have learnt our lesson, we are not dead at all. So we live for centuries, for trillion years of years. Unimaginable vastness of life is here. So nobody should take this life casually only for life. They should understand, they have big choice to live eternally or die eternally or to burn eternally or suffer eternally.
Q # 10: What is the difference between mystic of ecstasy and mystics of sobriety?

A: These are two states of minds. Some people have very strong nervous system and some people have less strong nervous system; some people have very vast knowledgibility and some people have lesser grade of knowledgibility; some people can control their feelings. It is difference between chemistry. May be they all look for God but some people can not possibly tolerate their chemistry; they sort of those higher limits of understanding. So those people were stuck right away. They were not capable of over growth. They are called majzoob. They are of God and they are known as saints of ecstasy. They are like majzoob but he is not allowed to talk. Because he will see a lot many things which other people don’t see. Their sensory perception goes to a maximum extent and they can have the visitation. They can see the film rolling on, who is coming; who is going and what is future and what is behind? But they are not allowed to express because this is not Allah’s way (normal people have normal way of living) this is odd. So, saints of ecstasy are excluded from the society. And the other way of those people who learn; who teach; who are capable of conceiving an idea fully, perceived the truth and then they are capable of teaching also. They are better people. They are known as saints of sobriety.

Q # 11: Explain the different ways of exercises; zikar, fikar muraqaba, and mujahida?

A: These are patterns and manners which few people have adopted; they thought they are better. But in fact you see all Tareeqa’s are one and the same. How can you separate a man of God from the other man of God, except for his rank? We start all together. May be Sheikh Abdul Qadir Jillani, Khawja Moe-u-deen Chishti Ajmeri, and Khawja Faree-ud-deen Ganj Shaker; all these people start as the same simple human beings, whether very very strong desires for God and for love. Now we see there can be no difference between these people. It is not there. No man of God is jealous of another man of God. There are brothers of same profession; of the same trade. So they love each other, according to the verse of Quran.
‘These people love each other for God sake’
So no difference! But the people who came after, they created all these differences. They created all these mannerism in them. You can be balance and you can move without any concentration towards God. It depends on your mind the way you choose; what kind of method. Suppose I feel hungry. My way of removing hunger is; I would eat less, according to the Prophet, I would say its ok! I will not eat full. May be I distribute my food to somebody else, the brother of mine and I eat less and my brother should eat with me that I should not eat full stomach. I should remain under size. The other person will say, No! I will starve, so that I could get over this hunger. Starvation is of harder way, one day; two days; three days and he will persist. They were very strong willed people. They knew they had certain faults which would not go without hard exercises. But people like me very weak. We were very small people and we thought we should only love God more. When I think my body makes a fault, I say I should love God more. I try to compensate things with love to God rather than starving my own self. Because according to Mahatma Siddhartha Buddha; even after twelve years of ‘Tapasia’ he said, ‘ it does not lie in killing in your body; it does not lie in starvation; it does not lie in hanging yourself on the twenty thousand height of Himalaya. It lies in understanding. So, we use our mind rather than starving our self. People have their own means and methods but not all of them turn Sufi out of those means and methods. And as Quran said,
‘These people have taken to the harder way of understanding reality and the truth and some of them got through, some of them fall apart.’
Q # 12: Do you think the golden age of Sufism is ended in Pakistan?
A: I think it is the beginning of golden age of Sufism in Pakistan. Pakistan- Sufism, Sufism –Pakistan is one and the same! Frankly telling you, this country is not politically made country. This country was basically made with one slogan. And the slogan which I already told you, which is the greatest priority of the saints; the whole earth is made for God. They used to raise slogans ‘Pakistan ka matlab kya La illa ha illal Allah’ (there is one God and no God). So the whole country is basically made out of a mystic law; of a Sufi law and it belongs to God. And it is made by the people of God and then we fell apart. We deceived ourselves, we deceived our ideals and then we suffer and till now we are suffering. But now there is a movement of revival. All movements should be in time! All revolutions come when God wishes them to come. Not me, not you! So the time is come and Allah means so. People are reviving their old faith. They are coming back to their Unitarian concepts. They know they have made a mistake and the mistakes they have made are very bad rulers. So they are starving. There is short of electricity; there is short of every thing where as this country is richer than hundreds in practical. So we have to back to God; we have to beg Him. So back to Sufism; it is not Sufism, back to real Islam, back to real believers. Sufi is just a word; the real word for this is a Momin, (to gain that Imman; to gain that Islam and Imman) Islam is a general condition of faith.Imaan is a very particular condition of faith. Imman is equivalent to Sufism. Sufi is rather a word given to a Momin (A man who has high faith in God) so in Pakistan we are turning back. (Every thing goes back to its origin.)So we are also going back to our Prophet and God, Inshallah!
Q: 13 How does a Sufi maintain harmony between his mind and heart?
Answer: You are looking for harmony outside. Harmony is a basic law. When you go to search and look for something, if you are divided within heart and mind; you get divided in action also. So this is a basic thing a Sufi gains in this search i.e. the heart and mind co- ordinate; they co-realate; they re-unite in their wishful thinking. It is not that only mind thinks of God. Basically the basic emotion gets out of the heart. It burns for God, it wishes for the truth. That’s how the mind also in the beginning does not agree but finally it also moves along. So this is absolutely a very fair very fair balance of mind and heart that leads you to God. Its not half mind or half heart; its full heart and a full mind and now again you know the basic approach is not illiterate; illiterate has no way toward this. But illiteracy is of two kinds; academic illiteracy is of two kinds. Academic illiteracy may be he is not PhD, not post graduate nothing at all. But still he is very much literate about his inner self. All this knowledge which is on earth in degrees in class ways, engineering, medicine; this is vocational knowledge. You mean to earn out of all these professions. Even an artist makes a picture for earning money, for recognition or money. So we say there is only one pure knowledge; the knowledge which is looking for the ultimate truth which is not rewarded by any earthly king or queen. It’s only rewarded by God, rest of all branches of knowledge leads to vocational and professional achievements. And this bit of understanding only leads to the ultimate height of truths. And this is basically mental literacy, no illiteracy. Even God curses rather and blame those people and feels very strongly angry about those who do not think or do not consider Ayah/ verses in their mind. They do not think at all. They just have blind faith in God. He does not like blind faith. Again He says; any body who dies; dies of a bad argument, he dies of a wrong argument and any body who lives; lives with a good argument. So Allah is all for knowledge; for argument; for constantly thinking and He created us for thinking. Not for this like animals. That is the difference between animals and us. Animals have blind faith. We do not have.
Q: 14 Define ‘Nafs’ ‘Qalb’ Rooh’.
Answer: Well! Many things have been said about these. Actually you don’t know any thing. You always pass a confusing statement about those things. When people did not know much about Nafs they said; it is the greatest enigma in the history of mankind (what is nafs) but it was not difficult. Nafs is actually the basic packet of your instincts, when get together they create a self that is nafs. And Qalb is a place; its very equivalence place where wisdom and nafs both act. It is a place. If I don’t have a place for anger in my heart I won’t get angry. Even if the Satan works very hard with me we provide him something from inside so it is a kind of land where he cast his seed. Heart is a place which lives with God. It only remains happy with God. But when it is not with God it is land of mischief. So everybody can come and puts some wrong in it. So I already told you when things go cracked, Qalb and nafs from a bad way of thinking moves on too. As Quran says:
God has created every thing in balance.
Nafs is fifty percent wisdom and fifty percent of the satanic impression. When you do get balance, heart gets balance, even Rooh gets balance. But when it gets corrupted, heart gets corrupted even the spirit gets corrupted and you go to Hell. When these are impaired, when they are not properly functioning, when they are not fulfilling the purpose of their creation they go to Hell. And if they succeed in knowing themselves Even a particle of faith will not die. Even a particle of faith will take you to the heaven if you are sincere. So basically there is no difference. We use people, use the mystic the mystic, use these words for facility. They don’t have any worthwhile explanation, what is heart? What is this? May be a teacher explains it as metaphysically, others mystically, the third one scientifically. And basically they use these words and phraseology for explaining certain conditions of mind so nafs is a word which is used for all negative qualities of man. And Qalb is a name which is used for a balanced sheet which has fifty percent both. And Rooh is used for the utmost purification of life. There are three mental conditions. I have never found a difference between Rooh and nafs and all this because to me they all work together this way or that way.
Q: 15 Is there continual between them?
Answer: Sometimes there is a contradiction between them; your mind wants something different and your heart something else. But those contradictions are ultimately solved when they converged on a decision. They have to reach a decision. If they are not coming to a compromise that man will be considered to be very indecisive. So naturally they have to come to a decision. The moment they come to a decision ;suppose the heart wants to eat and mind forces not to eat but normally heart rules, wishes rules, desires rules, emotions rules and centre of all these blind forces is not mind. Mind is a computer; in half of a second you give a feeling to mind and it intelligently interpreses, gives its clothing, give it words, makes a sentence, express a desire but basically the emotions are born at heart.





Different ways of exercises; zikar, fikar muraqaba, and mujahida

Different ways of exercises; zikar, fikar muraqaba, and mujahida:
These are patterns and manners which few people have adopted; they thought they are better. But in fact you see all Tareeqa’s are one and the same. How can you separate a man of God from the other man of God, except for his rank? We start all together. May be Sheikh Abdul Qadir Jillani, Khawja Moe-u-deen Chishti Ajmeri, and Khawja Faree-ud-deen Ganj Shaker; all these people start as the same simple human beings, whether very very strong desires for God and for love. Now we see there can be no difference between these people. It is not there. No man of God is jealous of another man of God. There are brothers of same profession; of the same trade. So they love each other, according to the verse of Quran.
‘These people love each other for God sake’
So no difference! But the people who came after, they created all these differences. They created all these mannerism in them. You can be balance and you can move without any concentration towards God. It depends on your mind the way you choose; what kind of method. Suppose I feel hungry. My way of removing hunger is; I would eat less, according to the Prophet, I would say its ok! I will not eat full. May be I distribute my food to somebody else, the brother of mine and I eat less and my brother should eat with me that I should not eat full stomach. I should remain under size. The other person will say, No! I will starve, so that I could get over this hunger. Starvation is of harder way, one day; two days; three days and he will persist. They were very strong willed people. They knew they had certain faults which would not go without hard exercises. But people like me very weak. We were very small people and we thought we should only love God more. When I think my body makes a fault, I say I should love God more. I try to compensate things with love to God rather than starving my own self. Because according to Mahatma Siddhartha Buddha; even after twelve years of ‘Tapasia’ he said, ‘ it does not lie in killing in your body; it does not lie in starvation; it does not lie in hanging yourself on the twenty thousand height of Himalaya. It lies in understanding. So, we use our mind rather than starving our self. People have their own means and methods but not all of them turn Sufi out of those means and methods. And as Quran said,
‘These people have taken to the harder way of understanding reality and the truth and some of them got through, some of them fall apart.’


پروفیسر احمد رفیق اختر

پروفیسر احمد رفیق اختر



پروفیسر احمد رفیق اختر جدید رور کے ایک ممتاز مسلم سکالر ہیں جن کے خیالات کی روشن خیالی سے موجودہ دور کی صبح نو کا آغاز ہوا۔ کتابی تعارف کے مطابق پیچیدہ سوالات کے جوابات عقل سے دیتے ہیں۔ انہوں نے اپنے زمانہ طالب علمی کے دوران ادب، فلسفہ، مختلف النوع مذاہب اور تمام معاصر مضامین کا بغور مصالعہ کیا اور پھر اسی گہرے مطالعاتی رحجان نے بالآخر خداشناسی تک ان کی رہنمائ کی۔ ذہنی استفسار کی مسلسل پیش رفت نے انہیں بالآخر منطقی انجام تک پہنچادیا۔ آپ اس مطالعاتی اپروچ کے مالک ہیں جو کسی طور بھی عقلی دلیل اور مروجہ سائنسی اصولوں کی کسوٹی پر پرکھے بغیر مطمیئن ہی نہیں ہوتی۔ اپنے پیشے کے چناوء کے دوران ان ک ذہانت اور پرچار کو جو کہ اس وقت اپنے بام عروج پر تھے فطرت کی ایک پیچیدہ پرین گتھی سے نبردآزما ہونا پڑ گیا کہ، " خدا موجود ھے کہ نہیں "، " کیا میں آذاد ھوں؟ یا کسی ان دیکھی الہامی ہستی یا قوت کو جوابدہ ھوں؟ "

ذہنی تحقیقات کے اس سفر کا آغاز شک اور انکار سے ھوا۔ مرکزیت توجہ، مطالعاتی سمت اور غور و فکر میں ان کی زندگی کے آٹھ سال صرف ہوۓ۔ انہوں نے اپنی تمام تحقیقات اور جدوجہد کو صرف ایک نقطہ کی تلاش میں وقف کیا کہ کسی طرح خدا کی موجودگی کا انکار کیا جا سکے۔ ان کا مقالہ نہایت آسان تھا کہ، اگر ایک انسان ہزار بار بھی خطا کا مرتکب ہو تو بھی وہ انسان کہلاۓ گا مگر خدا کی اگرایک بھی غلطی نکل آۓ تو وہ خدا نہیں کہلوا سکتا۔ چناچہ انہوں نے تلاش خدا وند کیلیۓ اس حجت کو ایک معیار مقرر کرنے کا اعلان کیا کہ خدا کے الفاظ ( قرآن ) میں سے صرف ایک خطا کو ڈھونڈھ لیں۔ ان کی تمام چھان بین، سائنسی تحقیقات، علمی تحقیقات اور تلاش بیکار گئ جب انہیں پتہ چلا کہ ان کی جملہ سعی نے وجود خداوند اور قرآن کا اثبات کیا ھے۔ نتیجاتاً انہوں نے خدا کو اپنی اولین ترجیح بنالیا۔ وہ پہلے سے ہی ایک استاد تھے لیکن اب رخ بدل گیا ھے ان کا یقین واثق ھے کہ اللہ تجسس علمیہ کی ترجیح اول ھے

www.alamaat.com

God or Nature ?

The Argument with Reference to Quran 

by Prof. Ahmad Rafique Akhtar.


An extract from The Argument with Reference to Quran by Prof. Ahmad Rafique Akhtar.

The tragedy of human thought is that the question it asks is cannot be answer by Man. You don’t have to burden yourself with believing in God, but answer to the question of life and universe which human intellectual have tried to give have been waste of time and nothing more then idle talk. The essence of this argument is this:

It is not God but nature, which created the cosmos.


Nature, limited by the laws of science undertakes its creative activity without any thought or feeling. It is nature, who itself is governed by law of Gravity, which has proposed the Theory of Relativity, and has designed the structure of the Atom. The brain of nature has designed the genetic code, which forms the basis of life, and active in organising the complex world of microorganism, and is responsible for their evolutionary stages of development. Its nature, which wields its authority over life and death. It is the artist who creates the miracles of beauty and ugliness. It array a vast array of feeling and thought; it is witnessed in wonderful rainbow of life, in the rose and tulip, and in the song of nightingale and turtledove. Nature is the pure consciousness. It is the accomplisher, the creator and maker. Nature is death, destruction and total annihilation.
What a injustice then, is the fact that nature despite having absolute intelligence, faculty of speech and the most sophisticated tools of creation, is itself is totally mute and does not speak with us. The arguments of the devotee of nature are clearly ludicrous. Nature is not a ‘being’. It is totally speechless and cannot even tell us “I AM NATURE”, I am the Lord of all, whatever you are it is because of me, I bring together the opposite of life and death, I am the laws of creation and destruction, but the tragedy is that having granted you speech, letters and books, intelligence and communication and mountains of poetry and eloquence, i myself have become totally mute, and do not have the power to manifest and express myself in anyway, O what a calamity that I am more helpless and weak than my own creation, at the very least I am not God’. It is at this point that the statistics of God begin to stack up.....

The Destructive Self

The Destructive Self


Deliberation and reflection on the human self has continued unabated over the centuries. From the time when self-realisation was linked to the recognition of God, the wayfarers in the procession of divine passion began to search for salvation in the enchanting and tempting vastness of the human Self. This enigma has continued to engage mankind under the guise of various names, such as, self-consciousness, deep understanding and self-realisation. Few, however, have succeeded in attaining to the depth of its meanings: whilst those who were afraid of it, grew more in terror as their understanding of it grew.
Those that did gain some knowledge of it found the Nafs to be the archenemy of Man, dominating every aspect of his life: the lawful and unlawful; good and evil; chaos and order; poverty and opulence; war and peace; the positive and the negative. Further, they witnessed it in the pomp and glory of the victorious and in the wretchedness of the vanquished; in the sublime knowledge and wisdom and in the prejudices of the populace; in the dignity and awe of Kings, and in the petitions of the penniless; in the refined style of wordsmiths and in the vulgar tongues of the rabble; in the romance of love and beauty and in the backdrop of libidinal desires. In short the influence of this corrupting self was felt everywhere.
The question arises: What was its origin? And what is its true nature?
The issue was not always that complicated. Over aeons of time animal characteristics firmly lodged themselves in the inner consciousness of Man. To such an extent that human life, which began on the basis of survival and self-defence, was unable to shed these characteristics even in the midst of the most advanced social and economic structures. All human systems, no matter how supportive they appear, have in some fundamental way aided and supported some aspect of the Nafs.
Despite the change of battlefield and type of contest, the conclusion of the struggle between Man and beast was replaced by the struggle of mutual rivalry between Homo Sapiens. Before this time, Man, on a collective level, was as one single body fiercely upholding his individuality in the face of opposition from other forms of life. Emotions of generosity and kindness grew in strength alongside the spirit of rebellion and arrogance: survival is avarice for life. Furthermore, the sense of survival that the Prophet Suleyman (PBUH) witnessed in the procession of ants surged like a herd of wild elephants in its diverse and varicoloured forms in the character traits of Man.
Knowledge and wisdom failed to release the human Self, which had its origins in the struggle for survival, from the mindset of survival. Instead, it altered the means of achieving the same goal. For instance the entire fields of arts and sciences, which attained mastery in the understanding of physical reality, and all the methods adopted by civilised Man, all had their centre and focal point in the promotion of ease, comfort and the strengthening of the Self. The Self constructed channels which would promote sympathy and affection within Man in its favour, and would be regarded as the ultimate standards of humanity.
How could Man possibly regard as an enemy that which had seeped into his consciousness, becoming a fundamental part of his life and was now flowing within his blood and veins? Despite the exhortations to adopt the path of guidance, it was an extremely difficult challenge for Man to see himself as his own enemy. Indeed, for whom should he wage this war on himself and for what reward: ‘friendship’ of God and an unseen paradise! Moreover, the human self depends for its support on outward causes. It convinces and influences Man through the agency of the five senses. As a result, Paradise was seen as a mirage and an empty promise, impossible to test before death, not to mention God and the intellect, which were far removed from the ambit of the five senses and the boundaries of the heart and vision.
The Nafs is another name for the nerve centre of Man: it is his childhood, his youth and his old age. Indeed, the human self is a ‘packet’ of needs and wants. It is a defence system, resting on the basic instincts of Man, which has, since prehistoric times, become so powerful that the entire body of science and knowledge cannot withstand its defence weaponry. Lurking in the ‘trench’ of survival this warrior is familiar with the strategies needed to ward off all the assaults of knowledge and reason. However, its greatest weapon is to show sympathy and affection to its ‘victim’. This then, is a war which Man has no desire to win. There is no compensation or blood money forthcoming for the one who is slain. In the words of the Generous Lord: ‘I created my biggest enemy in the form of Man’. Indeed, the inner consciousness of Man is ruled by this Dajjal and his acts of construction are in truth acts of destruction. This Anti-Christ dwells in both you and me. The statement ‘I am’ is an expression of its individuality, for it divides both people and the person and is the personality of every individual. It can be glimpsed in the scholar’s boastings of his knowledge, in the depraved behaviour of the ignorant, in the ascetic's display of piety, in the man of letters' desire for fame, and in the prince's desire for power and glory.
Psychologists attempted to understand the workings of this bundle of instincts. They searched for the underlying principles of Man’s reactions and behaviour. They subjected his feelings to the theories of ‘inferiority’ and ‘superiority’. Discovering in the process a whole host of complexes, phobias, neuroses, psychoses, fantasies and evil whisperings, insanity and madness, lurking in the mind of Man. Further, they searched for the fundamental causes of fear and depression.
But why?
Their goal was neither to find God nor to explore the self in order to find God. It was merely to activate, to reinvigorate, and to strengthen the Self which had become passive, downtrodden, defeatist and inactive. This was simply so that it could once more resume the struggle for survival. However, the main distinguishing factor between psychologists and Sufis is that the former seek to understand the Self for the sake of the Self, whereas, the latter seek to understand it so that they can place it in the service of God. Moreover, Nafs and desire are two inseparable companions and together they carve out the priorities and preferences of the Nafs, to the extent that desires, bosom companions of Satan, can affect and alter the ‘seasons’ of the Nafs. The nature of the Nafs is that it craves to dominate others. It jealously guards its own possessions, yet it seeks to plunder the property of others. Set aside clemency and forbearance: all the civilised behaviour of the Nafs is nothing but ‘camouflage’ and defensive ploys. It is the governor of the province of ‘No Mercy’ and ‘No Remorse.’ Appeals for clemency only add fuel to its tyranny. Further, in defeat it turns dangerous and seeks to inflict injury on others. The full brunt of its enmity is directed towards the alien soul which originates from an alien place and dwells within its territory. It exerts its entire efforts to prevent the Soul from returning to its source of origin.
In contrast, the choice and priorities of the soul are clear and eminently superior. It possesses the consciousness of the One God, and despite being imprisoned in a physical body its yearning for the divine presence never ceases. The Nafs seeks to wipe out this memory and longing and, like the Angels imprisoned in the chasm of Babel, the subjugation of the spirit to the body and mind is its fundamental goal. In this struggle for Man's humanity, the Nafs seeks assistance from Satan by occupying the pathways leading to the Sublime Assembly of Angels (Mala ‘Alaa). Moreover, benefiting from centuries of experience in this struggle, the Nafs becomes a terrifying social force whom none has the power to subjugate save God. As the Prophet Yusuf (PBUH) said:
Nor do I absolve My own self (of blame): the (human) self is certainly prone to evil, unless My Lord do bestow His mercy: but surely my Lord is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful. (12:53)
None is spared from the attacks of the Nafs, for the Nafs always commands evil, only those for whom God has mercy are saved from it. Thus only divine intervention can protect the soul from the domination of the acquisitive and merciless Nafs.
God has declared war on this enemy and has made it known that one who yearns for His love and intimacy must oppose the Nafs no matter what form it takes or what strategy it employs. In every age, the Nafs drapes the ‘corpses’ of its devotees in the latest style of shrouds: if not as Olympus, Brahman, Shiva and Vishnu, Ashtar and Isis, then as the models of abstract philosophies. If not in the worship of physical objects, then in the festivals of culture and tradition, in the complementary understanding of ecstasy and sobriety, and in the interaction between literature and homosexuality. Today, in our day and age, in the labelling of oppression and injustice as civilisation and the mass media’s propaganda as truth, in the movements of indecency and obscenity promoted in the name of art, idol worship parades under the guise of the fine arts, and any mention of God is dubbed backwardness. Indeed, these phenomena are master strokes of the Nafs, and executed with the utmost of ease.
The tyrannical Nafs is always close. So it comes as no surprise when we witness it in the poet’s smile on receiving applause for his poetry; in the writer's eye, as it sparkles in a literary assembly held in his honour; in the politician's hand as it waves to a cheering crowd; in the humble nod of the holy man’s head, when the praises of his piety are sung; and in the champion who puffs his chest in pride at the rehearsal of his achievements. In all these situations the Nafs is in extremely close contact. Furthermore, when the Nafs enters our consciousness, God withdraws. For proximity to the Nafs means only distancing from God, the distance between Heaven and Hell, the distinction between the Rahman (Allah) and the Shaytaan, between the forces of evil and the forces of good, and in the conflict between light and darkness. Thus the manifestations of the Nafs are unlimited.
Consider the pieces on a chessboard. Despite being limited to just a few pieces, the numbers of possible moves that can be made are, perhaps, over a billion. Similar is the case of the Nafs. Consisting of a few fundamental instincts common to both humans and animals, the mutual interactions and permutations of these handfuls of instincts are unlimited. According to one mystic, 'to this day I have not fathomed two things: the stations of rank of Muhammad (PBUH), and the forms of deception employed by the Nafs.' However, individual instincts acting on their own cannot exert influence and control over the Nafs without the mutual involvement of other motivating instincts. From all of these, desire is the ultimate driving force of the Nafs, and it operates on ever more sophisticated levels as Man becomes more ‘educated and cultured’. It reaches a stage where it goes beyond the control system of the fundamental balance placed inside Man. When this occurs, destruction becomes its second nature.
The Nafs, nevertheless, does not deceive: rather it is sincere in its deception, since both its scientific and emotional natures are closely intertwined. Furthermore, its governing principles are plain and evident, namely that the survival instinct does not recognize any moral values. It has, from time immemorial, been accompanied by all the aides and supporters it requires to maintain its continued existence: envy, rancour, slander, anger, rage and lust. Not a single one of them will ever betray the Nafs, operating universally without distinction of race and religion. Despite fluctuations in the severity and vigilance of their attacks, their aims undergo no such change and remain stable. For instance, their collaboration does not always lead to killing and bloodshed, but envy does not permit even a shred of compassion to enter its dealings.
These qualities stand diametrically opposed to the attributes of God and are devoid of any sense of reverence. Their field of work is restricted and their horizons extremely limited. The sublime sense of tranquillity is rarely witnessed in the conduct of these instincts which, akin to a blazing forest fire, seek to scorch and ravage instantly everything in their path, offering no opportunities to stop and pause. Its flames are fanned by the winds of egoism, defiance and self-respect. The latter is perhaps the most puzzling and in need of further investigation. It is an interesting and amusing fact that the vast majority of people regard ‘self-respect’ as an admirable attribute. The truth, however, is that the notion of self-respect is a ‘Palace of Glass’ built on the twin foundations of luxury or ease, and a sense of inferiority. Indeed, we do not possess a criterion to assess the self, for it constructs itself by exploiting the crisis and insecurities which we experience in our lives, from childhood into old age. The Nafs adopts the path of antagonism or the path of harmony towards its victim, depending on its situation, and becomes itself the raw material for the manufacture of ‘self-respect’.
In this scenario ‘self-respect’ becomes a highly intricate psychological concern. Despite the fact that the Nafs can be regarded as a factor of great significance and weight, it can, nevertheless, be fully understood in the early stages of its development and before a man becomes ‘cultured and educated’. With the growth of skills, education and new outlooks in a person, the Nafs begins to resort to a greater degree of sophistication in its ‘technical’ capacities. Consequently, the acquisition of knowledge and art leads to the development of increasingly refined and enigmatic emotions. When united with personal and self-influenced preferences, these feelings result in the Nafs going beyond the scope of accountability.
This is the phase in which one's entire spiritual prowess and thinking becomes a target for manipulation by the Nafs. For no one can surpass it in the hatching of reasons to justify itself. Exploiting the whole spectrum of values of good and evil, the human Self displays the results of its handiwork everywhere: pride, arrogance, detestation of others and their opinions, ostentation and show, the hunger for power, assigning importance to oneself, scientific and intellectual boasting, surrounding oneself by like-minded people, creating ‘mirages’ through speech and manipulation of emotions, creating divisions among people, self-love, material opulence, the pandering after choice, the designation of identified approaches to various branches of learning, and in the latest styles of culture and civilisation. We witness the handiwork of the Nafs wherever we turn.
In the western intellectual climate, despite its advancement, longing for power and fame is regarded as a fundamental part of human nature. Thus receiving praise for one's achievements and striving one's utmost for this goal is seen as something noble and worthwhile. Similarly, in the East the endless list of honorific titles at all levels is an evident illustration of the Self’s handiwork. No religious scholar, thinker or professional sees any harm in receiving these titles, whose very roots lie in flattery and hyperbole, which ultimately originates in the Self’s flattery and praise of the admirers themselves. Both the mystic and the cynic view the intrusions of the Nafs with ridicule and derision. Despite his mockery and sarcasm of the Self, the cynic cannot, however, shelter himself from being consumed by the flames of envy and anger, a product of the Self’s counter attack. In contrast, the mystic neutralises the states and feelings induced by the Self through the adoption of a sublime philosophy of life, intellectual modesty, and achieving balance in life. Furthermore, the cynic resists the Self like a diseased man who shows contempt towards everyone who is healthy. The mystic, walking under the shade of divine love and affection, does not regard his merits over others as deriving from his own person, but rather he considers all notions of excellence and pre-eminence as a trust and favour from God. Thus he is preserved from the destructive emotions of arrogance and conceit, for he realises too well that any claim to ‘superiority’ (godhood) based on borrowed ‘goods’ is transitory and groundless.
The Nafs does, however, have its rivals. Humour is a deadly poison for the Nafs for it possesses an equal footing to the greatness and superiority of the Self. Of course, humour can act as a tool of the Nafs in many ways: finding faults and weaknesses in others, assassination of their character, creating scandals, invading the privacy of others, and gaining pleasure by degrading others. These are amongst the favourite pastimes of humour. However, when it turns its gaze on itself, it succeeds in breaking the enchanting spell of ‘self-sympathy and support’. Digging its heels in the trenches of self-deception and self-centredness, it deals heavy and sustained blows to the scheming Self. Is not the one who can laugh at himself a thousand times better than one who laughs at the expense of another? The Nafs routinely ignores its own defects and yet is constantly vigilant of its status and standing. However, this watchdog over the Nafs is above morals of right and wrong, oblivious to honour or disgrace, even-handed in times of want and plenty. It flourishes merely through the complete aid and assistance of God. Humour recognises that hopes and aspirations are not the function of the needy, for their period of duration is not long: nor does it attribute its aptitude and ability as originating from itself; nor claim the right of ownership over loaned ‘goods,' nor does it regard life on Earth as perpetual. Further, it regards the ultimate goal of knowledge as the achievement of balance and equilibrium in life.
Thus, humour prevents the Nafs from displaying sympathy towards itself and obliges it to accept its shortcomings. It tolerates each and every person in accordance with his or her intellectual capacities. The single most important factor behind the pervasive influence, in the present age of conditions such as impetuosity, discontent, depression and boredom, is the refusal of self-accountability, promotion of self-absorption, the desire for ease and comfort, and in the displacement of reverence by the desire to become God. Despite the acceptance of the Eternal and All-Governing God, indifference and active striving against His guidance, management and submission leads us to assume personal, splintered and self-centred ideas, as well as the adoption of negative lifestyles. As a result, there is bloodshed and destruction, intense emotions of dissatisfaction, insomnia, and memory loss. The present age is deeply suffering from these factors.
The Nafs does not deceive; rather the phases of trial and testing that the children of Adam have to undergo are of two types: the static and the dynamic. The former ‘technology’ is centred on the Self, whilst the latter is under the control and guidance of Shaytaan. The technology of the Nafs is characterised as static since it does not possess any originality both in its aims and its methods. From pre-eternity until the genesis of Man the Self, yearning for everlasting life, led Man astray. The outcast Shaytaan manifested this yearning in the time and space dimensions of Paradise with the result that Adam was distanced from the vicinity of God.
The Self furnishes and prepares the ground in which Shaytaan sows the seeds of corruption, followed by the growth of the sturdy tree of ‘repulsive desires.’ It is a poisonous ‘shrub’ which destroys the healthy harvest of knowledge and understanding. The lethal success of the Nafs rests primarily on the mind of Man and the lack of knowledge and ignorance of the commands and counsels of the Generous Lord. God, like a Great and Eminent Teacher, does not employ compulsion in the matters He has given choice to Man. Indeed, it would not have been difficult for God to make the whole of Mankind accept His guidance. None would have the power to refuse, nor even to contemplate it. Even the notion of disobedience would not exist.
If this had been the case, the purpose of education would not have been achieved, since the fundamental goal of education is to develop the capacity to make right choices. For instance, giving a man no choice and then passing judgement on him, would be an arbitrary and pointless system and God is certainly not inequitable. Thus Man was provided with opportunities to develop his intellectual capacity through a variety of supportive and encouraging methods. Alongside this, the Self too was equipped with the capacity to sense loss and express regret. From time to time it is possible for this capacity to lead Man to awareness, and offer him, yet again, another opportunity to regain his sense of balance and soundness.
In short, this human saga in God’s view consists merely of three possibilities: sin or error, the sense of regret, and repentance and forgiveness. Can there be anyone more unjust than the one who knows he has wronged, knows that his repentance will be accepted, and still fails to make amends for his loss and failures? It is this injustice and ignorance alluded to by God in the Quran as the ‘trust’ of knowledge bestowed on Man. The rehabilitation of Man and inspiring him towards it by means of hardship is at least in God’s wisdom not a possibility, since hardship can itself lead to a kind of enmity and the harbouring of hidden notions of pride and arrogance. Indeed, sacrificing ones life is not such a worthwhile action and, certainly not one which leads to deserving the proximity and closeness of God. If this were the case, the sturdy bull which drives the oil press would surely be the greatest mystic and knower of God! The Self adulterates logical necessity with false claims and demands, making it a constituent part of Shaytaan’s repertoire.
In any case, God regards Man as superior to beasts and animals, and intellect as the most distinguished part of his creation. Deliberation and reflection offers Man the capacity to make his choices more freely and autonomously. Although the Nafs promotes the currency of its transitory preferences and priorities, recognising true identity is a product of the efforts of ones Fitrah (primordial nature) and balanced intellectual curiosity. However, the Nafs does possess a vulnerability which can be exploited by the people of knowledge. It is this weakness which can be utilised to temper its excesses and halt the flow of its destructive tendencies, namely that the Nafs possesses, more than any other desire, intense curiosity and inquisitiveness. It is continuously engaged in the acts of smelling, tasting and finding out. It seeks amazing and bewildering sensations and occurrences, always hungry for new experiences, and it has a passion for individuality. This passion drives it to seek knowledge of the world and its surroundings and occasionally directs it to tread the path leading to God.
By utilising the Self’s inquisitiveness and curiosity, its level of knowledge and training can be increased, thus distinguishing it from the common masses and the poorly educated. It resembles a wild predatory beast almost impossible to tame. However, it is not uncommon to observe that even wild and predatory animals such as lions, wolves, wild dogs, and poisonous snakes can be reared as pets. In the early stages of training, and despite its willingness, the Self revolts and refuses to submit on account of its original characteristics. It unceasingly struggles to act according to its former tendencies and habits. Similarly, in the early stages of its ‘nurturing’ the Nafs should not be driven by any sublime and worthy ideals, rather its curiosity should be used to make it seek and strive harder.
After the completion of its training and the adoption of new habits and tendencies, the Nafs is eager to stamp its individuality and distinguish itself from others. With the passage of time and growth of knowledge the Nafs begins to develop love and affection for this new approach and internalises it as a permanent and freely chosen practice. This developmental stage of the Self’s thought, leads to the desire to seek the friendship of God. The ideas of this new ‘world’ and the discovery of new horizons prevent the Self from abandoning this choice for divine longing. All the while, its original instincts are striving to pull it back to its days of ignorance (Jahiliyya). However, the strength and fortitude of the new practices keep it steadfast on the path towards God. Further, through the mercy and support of God, tranquillity and inspiration descends upon the Self. This unexpected blessing is one that the human self has never tasted before. It is now that its purpose in life becomes crystal clear and its beliefs and thoughts clarified. Indeed, ultimate consciousness is attained.
However, this phase is not without its own perils and dangers. Righteousness, coupled with the intense desire for piety and the hardships of the struggle for self-purification, seek to instil in the Self the craving to make claims of superiority and the pursuit of a special status. In this phase of its intellectual evolution, apart from the love of God and sincerity, nothing else can help the Nafs. Indeed, the love of God and submission to the Messenger are beacons of guidance in this way-station. However, compliance to the messenger does not merely consist of outward actions and optional acts of worship. Rather it requires a complete and in-depth understanding of the Prophet’s love, ethics and values.
In all of this, three ranks of the ‘sweetness’ of faith are clearly discernible. Firstly, when love is for the sake of Allah and enmity for the sake of Allah. Secondly, when love for the Messenger of Allah is stronger than all worldly ambitions and desire for wealth. Finally, when the Nafs feels absolute abhorrence to return to values of the animal instinct which are synonymous to unbelief or kufr. The Self at this stage of its ‘training’ will not, under any circumstances, turn back to its former ways. It is also at this stage that the minor mistakes of the Nafs are overlooked, and it is given the news of forgiveness both in this world and the next. This is alluded to in the Quran:
O the Nafs (that is) content, return to your Lord pleased and pleasing. So Enter (amongst) my bondsmen and enter my Paradise. (89: 28-30)
Finally, no one can claim to be the ultimate specialist or an expert on the Nafs. However, broadly speaking, the Nafs is surrounded by the habits and tendencies acquired during three main phases. Thus it consists of genetic qualities; immediate parental upbringing; and personally acquired capacities. The latter two factors seem more prominent and are easily identified. However, the former, centuries old ‘Fitrah’ can be an invincible enemy. Thus, the mystic fights his ultimate battle against his own ‘Fitrah’. In the face of overt and secret enemies, namely the Nafs and the Shaytaan, it is Allah alone who can influence this Fitrah, which He created. Ultimately, Allah’s grace and love can conquer this level.
(Translated from Muqaddama-tul-Quran .)

An English Edition of Muqaddama-tul-Quran by Prof.Ahmad Rafique Akhtar

THE ARGUMENT:
with reference to the Quran
by: Prof.Ahmad Rafique Akhtar


Saturday, August 9, 2014

SURA AL-MAEDA


سُوۡرَةُ المَائدة

ٱلۡيَوۡمَ أُحِلَّ لَكُمُ ٱلطَّيِّبَـٰتُ‌ۖ وَطَعَامُ ٱلَّذِينَ أُوتُواْ ٱلۡكِتَـٰبَ حِلٌّ۬ لَّكُمۡ وَطَعَامُكُمۡ حِلٌّ۬ لَّهُمۡ‌ۖ وَٱلۡمُحۡصَنَـٰتُ مِنَ ٱلۡمُؤۡمِنَـٰتِ وَٱلۡمُحۡصَنَـٰتُ مِنَ ٱلَّذِينَ أُوتُواْ ٱلۡكِتَـٰبَ مِن قَبۡلِكُمۡ إِذَآ ءَاتَيۡتُمُوهُنَّ أُجُورَهُنَّ مُحۡصِنِينَ غَيۡرَ مُسَـٰفِحِينَ وَلَا مُتَّخِذِىٓ أَخۡدَانٍ۬‌ۗ وَمَن يَكۡفُرۡ بِٱلۡإِيمَـٰنِ فَقَدۡ حَبِطَ عَمَلُهُ ۥ وَهُوَ فِى ٱلۡأَخِرَةِ مِنَ ٱلۡخَـٰسِرِينَ (٥)
سورة المَائدة
آج تمہارے واسطے سب پاکیزہ چیزیں حلال کی گئی ہیں اور اہلِ کتاب کا کھانا تمہیں حلال ہے اور تمہارا کھانا انہیں حلال ہے اور تمہارے لیے پاک دامن مسلمان عورتیں حلال ہیں اوران میں سے پاک دامن عورتیں جنہیں تم سے پہلے کتاب دی گئی ہےجب ان کے مہر انہیں دے دو ایسے حال میں کہ نکاح میں لانے والے ہو نہ بدکاری کرنے والے اورنہ خفیہ آشنائی کرنے والے اورجوایمان سے منکر ہوا تو اس کی محنت ضائع ہوئی اور وہ آخرت میں نقصان اٹھانے والوں میں سے ہو گا (۵)

Surah Al-Maeda
This day are (all) good things made lawful for you. The food of those who have received the Scripture is lawful for you, and your food is lawful for them. And so are the virtuous women of the believers and the virtuous women of those who received the Scripture before you (lawful for you) when ye give them their marriage portions and live with them in honour, not in fornication, nor taking them as secret concubines. Whoso denieth the faith, his work is vain and he will be among the losers in the Hereafter. (5)



Thursday, August 7, 2014

Prof.Ahmad Rafique Akhtar

Prof.Ahmad Rafique Akhtar (born April 15, 1941) is a Sufi Islamic scholar from Gujar Khan(Near Rawalpindi,Islamabad) in Pakistan.
His philosophy is simple: "If a man commits thousands of mistakes he still remains a human being, but if we find even one mistake of God, He can not be a God."
Researching God
Prof.Ahmad Rafique Akhtar dedicates himself to giving lectures on various aspects of Islam. He does so all over Pakistan but mainly from his home in Gujar Khan where he receives many students.
Most of his books are published in Urdu except for 'The Argument', a book which outlines his main ideas.
More info...
After having been a university professor for many years, Prof Rafique Akthar has retired from his post, dedicating himself to giving lectures and offering advice to all who seek for it. He has a particular following among the middle and upper class circles of Pakistan, which is why some of his ‘students’ (as he calls them) are important politicians and bureaucrats.
One day, I found myself in a room on the roof of his house, surrounded by about ten of his students. I was interested to hear what such a ‘modern Muslim guru’ had to say on God, religion, life and society. What follows is a small part of the long talk we had that day. If the answers of Prof. Akthar sometimes don’t seem to answer the questions, that’s simply because this was how the conversation went. In fact, it felt somewhat more like a monologue than a dialogue.
God should be the top priority of our intellectual curiosity.’ When I read your texts or look at some of your lectures, it quickly becomes clear that this statement is your main message